Bad Leadership – There is one thing worse

by Finn Majlergaard | 14. Mar, 2025 | Article, Blog

Share this content

We are good at reducing bad leadership

Most leaders and managers are well aware that the quality of their performance has a huge influence on the people they manage or lead. This is also why organisational feedback systems are so valuable because they indicate how and where the leader or manager can improve so that we can reduce bad leadership to a minimum.
I have helped leaders develop for almost two decades and for sure a lot has happened. We do have much better leaders and managers than 20 years ago.
But there is still a blind spot that we haven’t succeeded in dealing with effectively, namely non-management.

What is non-management?

 

Non-management is the situation where there is no management or leadership at all. There is a person in place but he or she doesn’t exercise their leadership or management at all. That leaves the organisation frustrated and leads to the development of an informal, Darwinistic organisation.

Non-management are particularly widespread in smaller and mid-sized companies, whereas larger companies usually have procedures to deal with that that involves training, coaching or removal of the managers or leaders who don’t do their jobs.

Being employed in an organisation where it is non-management is dreadful. You never know if you are doing the right or the wrong thing and you don’t know where the company is heading. It makes you feel insecure, frustrated and de-motivated. The vacuum created by the non- management gives space for people who want to fill the gap either out of frustration or because they have leadership ambitions.

In either case, the organisation is suffering and everybody can feel it. customers, employees, middle managers, suppliers and investors can feel that something is wrong, but they can point their fingers at one specific cause. When you have a situation with bad management it is easy because it is much more tangible what causes the bad situation. In this case of non-management, it is much more difficult.

The fear of taking responsibility

I was recently trying to help a hotel that had very bad ratings and they didn’t understand why. When I started to interview the employees and some guests it rapidly became clear that there was no management of the hotel despite there was a hotel manager employed. The owner of the hotel was tired of being involved in the hotel and had no leadership- og management skills herself. She only cared about the financials, which also meant that she never invested in getting the right skilled people on board. Everyone, including the hotel manager, was very young without any proper professional training. But all these young people did the best they could, but they all ended up frustrated, stressed out and de-motivated. That leads to bad ratings and very high employee turn-over.
What can you do to recover from bad leadership in the form of non-management?
If you have ever tried to work in a non-management environment you know how frustrating it is. You also know that your options for doing something are very limited. They are reduced to:

  • Leave and find a new job
  • Try to compensate for the non-management so that the customers don’t pay the price
  • Shout up with the risk of being fired.

The people who exercise non-management are often entrepreneurs who had a great idea that became successful. They are innovators and often get bored when the organisation grows and they have to spend time managing other people. Often innovators don’t trust other people can do the job as well as they can themselves. Therefore they either micro-manage or don't manage at all, like in the case described above.

To change the situation, it is my experience that the best thing the employees can do is to collectively formulate a latter where they outline the need for management and guidance. In that letter, they also have to emphasize that the non-management situation hurts the financial situation of the company. The attitude in the letter must be to help the owner making the business even better and make him or her understand that there is a clear correlation between employee satisfaction - customer satisfaction and profitability
Are you an entrepreneur who is exercising non-management?

What can you do to avoid non-management?

If you are a company owner and if you by now are wondering if the people in your organisation are satisfied or dissatisfied with who things are running there is only simple first move you can make. Ask! You might consider yourself a nice person, but people might still fear you or fear for what will happen if they speak up. So, therefore, you should try to make it possible for your employees to anonymously suggest how your company and organisation can improve. When they see that you are accepting the suggestions with an open mind and in the right spirit you can change the feedback method. But if you want honesty - start with anonymous feedback.

Dr Finn Majlergaard
Dr Finn Majlergaard

CEO Gugin, Professor, Author, Keynote Speaker, Author

  • We align your corporate culture with your strategy.
  • We take you safely through major changes in your organisation.
  • We develop the crucial cultural intelligence in your organisation by training your employees and leaders
  • We help you develop a competitive advantage with a unique corporate culture

Gugin has helped more than 600 companies around the world creating a winning corporate culture.

Contact Gugin

What separates a good leader from one who truly moves people? Research — and decades of cultural intelligence practice — point to one word: charisma. And unlike talent, charisma can be learned.

In 1979, Warner Records refused to send Prince on tour. Not because of his music — they knew he was exceptional — but because he lacked charisma. He couldn't yet move an audience. Fast forward one year, and Prince had transformed himself into one of the most commanding performers in the history of popular music. He didn't wait for charisma to arrive. He worked at it, systematically, studying and adopting the techniques of the performers he admired.

That story is not just about rock and roll. It is a precise metaphor for leadership. At Gugin, we have spent over two decades helping leaders across cultures and industries make exactly this kind of transformation — not by telling them to "be more confident," but by equipping them with concrete, learnable strategies rooted in emotional intelligence, cultural intelligence, and communication science.

 

Why Most Charisma Advice Fails

The most common advice leaders receive about charisma is frustratingly vague: project confidence, be warm, be present. These qualities do matter. But they are nearly impossible to "just do" on command, especially under pressure, across cultures, or in unfamiliar organisational contexts.

Research by Professor John Antonakis and his colleagues at the University of Lausanne Business School has shown that charisma is not a personality trait reserved for the few — it is a set of communicative behaviours that can be identified, taught, and practised. In their studies, randomly selected middle managers who underwent structured charisma training were subsequently rated by peers and subordinates as more charismatic, more competent, and more trustworthy. The training worked.

At Gugin, we have built on this science and gone further — weaving it together with emotional intelligence (EQ) and cultural intelligence (CQ) to create a leadership development approach that is both evidence-based and globally applicable.

The Nine Charismatic Behaviours — And What They Really Require

The Antonakis research identifies nine concrete charismatic leadership tactics: using metaphors and stories, showing moral conviction, expressing shared feelings, setting high expectations, using contrast and rhetorical questions, using lists, and animating communication with body language. These are the building blocks. But building blocks need a foundation — and that foundation is emotional and cultural intelligence.

Take metaphors, for example. A metaphor is only powerful if it resonates with the audience. In Gugin's cross-cultural leadership programmes, leaders quickly discover that a metaphor drawn from American sports culture may fall flat in a team from Northern Europe, and that a story invoking individual heroism may alienate a collectivist audience in East Asia. The charismatic tactic is the same; the cultural calibration is everything.

The same applies to moral conviction. Appealing to shared values is one of the most potent charismatic tools a leader has. But whose values? Which moral frameworks? A leader operating across multiple cultural contexts must understand that concepts like fairness, loyalty, duty, and hierarchy carry profoundly different weight in different cultures. High cultural intelligence — the ability to read, respect, and adapt to cultural difference — is what allows a leader to express genuine moral conviction that actually connects rather than alienates.

Emotional Intelligence: The Inner Architecture of Charisma

Charisma without emotional grounding is performance. It can work in the short term, but it rarely sustains trust. The leaders Gugin works with are taught to understand that emotional intelligence is not a soft supplement to charismatic leadership — it is its inner architecture.

Consider the tactic of expressing shared feelings. Antonakis identifies this as key: when a leader says "I feel the same uncertainty you do, and here is how I am holding it," they build identification and trust. But this requires real self-awareness. Leaders must be able to name and regulate their own emotional states before they can credibly reflect the emotions of others. In Gugin's programmes, we invest significant time in developing exactly this capacity — helping leaders identify their emotional triggers, understand how their inner states broadcast outward, and build the emotional vocabulary needed to communicate with authenticity.

Empathy — a core dimension of emotional intelligence — also directly underpins several charismatic behaviours. Setting high expectations while simultaneously communicating belief in others (another of the Antonakis tactics) requires a leader who genuinely sees the potential in the people around them. That kind of seeing is empathic. It cannot be faked over time. When Prince produced the band The Time for Warner Brothers, he did not simply demand excellence — he made each member believe they were capable of more than they thought. That is emotionally intelligent leadership in action.

Cultural Intelligence: Charisma That Travels

One of the most important — and most overlooked — dimensions of charismatic leadership in today's world is its cultural portability. A leader who is magnetic in one cultural context may be perceived as arrogant, shallow, or inappropriate in another. This is not a flaw in those audiences. It is a signal that charisma, like all communication, is culturally embedded.

Gugin's work in over 60 countries has shown us that the nine charismatic tactics are universal in their structure but must be culturally adapted in their expression. Rhetorical questions, for instance, invite participation and create anticipation — but their delivery must match the power-distance norms of the audience. In high-hierarchy cultures, a rhetorical question from a senior leader may silence a room rather than energise it. In low-hierarchy cultures, it may spark exactly the engagement intended. Cultural intelligence tells the leader which dynamic they are working in, and how to adjust.

Similarly, the use of storytelling — one of the most powerful charismatic tools — varies enormously across cultures in terms of what stories are appropriate, how direct or indirect they should be, and what kinds of protagonists resonate. Gugin teaches leaders to build a culturally diverse repertoire of stories and to develop the sensitivity to know which story belongs in which room.

How Gugin Trains Charismatic Leaders

Gugin's leadership development programmes integrate the science of charismatic communication with structured development in emotional and cultural intelligence. The process is iterative and experiential, not theoretical.

Leaders begin by gaining honest self-awareness: understanding how they are currently perceived, what emotional signals they project under pressure, and how their default communication style reads across cultures. This foundation phase often surfaces important blind spots — the technically brilliant executive who speaks too abstractly to inspire, the empathetic manager whose conflict-avoidance reads as a lack of conviction.

From there, leaders move into skill-building: practising charismatic communication tactics in safe, structured environments with real feedback. They learn to craft metaphors that carry cultural resonance, to tell personal stories that build connection without oversharing, to use contrast and rhetorical structure to sharpen their message. They receive coaching on non-verbal communication — the body language, vocal variety, and presence that Antonakis identifies as essential to bringing charisma alive.

Finally, leaders apply these skills in live contexts, with coaching support, and receive 360-degree feedback that tracks their progress. This mirrors the approach Antonakis found to be effective — group training combined with individual coaching — and embeds it within the broader cultural and emotional intelligence framework that makes the development durable and globally relevant.

Charisma as a Leadership Responsibility

There is a deeper point worth making. Charisma is not about making yourself more impressive. At its best, it is about making others feel seen, energised, and capable of more than they believed. It is about communicating in a way that bridges difference, builds shared purpose, and creates the conditions for people to do their best work.

In a world where leaders must navigate unprecedented complexity — technological disruption, geopolitical volatility, multi-generational and multicultural workforces — the ability to communicate with clarity, conviction, and emotional resonance is not optional. It is a strategic capability.

Prince didn't work on his charisma because he wanted to be famous. He worked on it because he knew, instinctively, that the music mattered — and that without the ability to connect, the music would never reach the people it was meant for.

The same is true of leadership. The work matters. Charisma is what carries it across.

 

About Gugin  |  Gugin is a global advisory firm specialising in cultural and emotional intelligence. We help organisations build the leadership capability to thrive in a complex, multicultural world. Learn more at www.gugin.com

error: Content is protected from theft