What is most important when hiring – Cultural fit or Skills?

by Finn Majlergaard | 3. Jan, 2025 | Blog, Article, featured

Share this content

Cultural fit or skills - what is most important when hiring people ? You will probably say both, but which one comes first? Do you start by looking for people who culturally fit into your organisation or do you start by looking for specific skills for a specific job?

In Gugin we have discussed that dilemma with our clients many times. Most of them have tried to hire candidates where his or her skills fitted perfectly with the requirements, but his or her personality just made it impossible to keep that person in the job. Terminating the employment contract a few months after you hired the person is sad for everyone involved. On top of that, it is costly for the employer and it might set you back operationally and strategically.

Harvard Business Review published a research article in 2018 with the title "Research: How One Bad Employee Can Corrupt a Whole Team". It was one of the triggers that lead us into doing our own research on our clients to see if checking for cultural fit would have a positive impact. It turned out to be the case.

 

Cultural fit - the dark horse when hiring people

It is fairly easy to find out if a candidate has the required skills for a particular job. And often you can get these skills verified through references, tests, interviews etc. But how do you find out if there is a good cultural fit between the candidate and the organisation?

That is a far more complex task but nevertheless even more important than finding a candidate with the right skills. There are many challenges associated with finding out if there is a cultural fit or not

  1. The first challenge is to identify the cultural DNA of your organisation. What are the true values of your organisation? Forget what you write in PowerPoint presentations and on websites about your values. At the best, they are good guesses but more often they are just wishful thinking. Without knowing your true cultural DNA in your organisation you can't select people who fit into that culture
  2. The second significant challenge in terms of cultural fit is to find a way to assess candidates effectively. Let us say you have a clear image of your cultural DNA in your organisation. How do you effectively test candidates to evaluate how good a cultural fit they have with your organisation?
  3. The third challenge is - how do you search for people who have the right cultural fit? Let us assume you know your cultural DNA and you have a proper assessment in place to test candidates for their level of cultural fit. It still leaves you with the challenge of actively searching for people with the right cultural fit.

How to identify your cultural DNA

The cultural DNA of your organisation tells about how your behaviour is in different situations and it explains your hierarchy of values when you are in a dilemma. To identify your cultural DNA you need to perform cultural due diligence. It is a process that systematically decomposes your organisation's behaviour, priorities, past experiences, policies, structure, motivation- and reward systems etc. The outcome is a cultural DNA that is the true image of how you behave, prioritise and lead. Gugin has developed its cultural due diligence process over the past 16 years in a synthesis between academia and experiences from having worked with hundreds of companies around the world. You can read more about it here

The importance of values

Most companies say that their most important asset is their employees, but in reality, the employees are just people who can be fired. And often we see that the first response to a situation where a company is under pressure is to fire people. How does that make sense? If you are under pressure do you start by getting rid of your most important asset?

Of course not. And that is a typical example of where there is a cultural gap between the values the company says it has and the values it really has.

In our book, a value is only a value if you are willing to sacrifice something for that value. Otherwise, it is just a statement. If your employees really are your most important asset you will use them to turn around the direction when you are under pressure.

Cultural fit or skills first?

Imagine there is a way where you can test candidates for cultural fit very early in the recruitment process - maybe even as the very first thing. Imagine that this test can be fully automated so that candidates are pre-screened even before you start matching their skills with the open positions. The good news is you don't have to imagine it - it is here.

Advantages of testing for cultural fit first

  1. You will hire people who can contribute with a lot more than just their skills. They add to the value system of your organisation and strengthen your corporate culture
  2. The new hires will stay a lot longer. Because there is a cultural fit the new hires will stay a lot longer because they are in a cultural environment that they like and can relate to. When we are in a comfortable cultural environment we are much more willing to take risks. It means that we are more willing to innovate and learn new skills than if we were only hired because of our skills.
  3. If you have an attractive corporate culture and your job candidates find it particularly attractive they will probably work for less or at least have less focus on the financial compensation because they get something very valuable as well - a mutual understanding and acceptance of values, and norms and priorities.

Want to get started? Here is how

Gugin brings all its expertise to identifying your cultural DNA. We do that with our cultural due diligence process which we facilitate on-site with you.

How is it implemented?

There are several ways we can implement the test.

It can be built into your existing recruitment systems so that it will have the look and feel of your corporate online presence.

You can also choose to run it from Gugin's extranet. It has the advantage that you can test for a cultural fit between your company and a candidate without disclosing your company name if that is important to you.

Let us have an informal call about how we can help you

What separates a good leader from one who truly moves people? Research — and decades of cultural intelligence practice — point to one word: charisma. And unlike talent, charisma can be learned.

In 1979, Warner Records refused to send Prince on tour. Not because of his music — they knew he was exceptional — but because he lacked charisma. He couldn't yet move an audience. Fast forward one year, and Prince had transformed himself into one of the most commanding performers in the history of popular music. He didn't wait for charisma to arrive. He worked at it, systematically, studying and adopting the techniques of the performers he admired.

That story is not just about rock and roll. It is a precise metaphor for leadership. At Gugin, we have spent over two decades helping leaders across cultures and industries make exactly this kind of transformation — not by telling them to "be more confident," but by equipping them with concrete, learnable strategies rooted in emotional intelligence, cultural intelligence, and communication science.

 

Why Most Charisma Advice Fails

The most common advice leaders receive about charisma is frustratingly vague: project confidence, be warm, be present. These qualities do matter. But they are nearly impossible to "just do" on command, especially under pressure, across cultures, or in unfamiliar organisational contexts.

Research by Professor John Antonakis and his colleagues at the University of Lausanne Business School has shown that charisma is not a personality trait reserved for the few — it is a set of communicative behaviours that can be identified, taught, and practised. In their studies, randomly selected middle managers who underwent structured charisma training were subsequently rated by peers and subordinates as more charismatic, more competent, and more trustworthy. The training worked.

At Gugin, we have built on this science and gone further — weaving it together with emotional intelligence (EQ) and cultural intelligence (CQ) to create a leadership development approach that is both evidence-based and globally applicable.

The Nine Charismatic Behaviours — And What They Really Require

The Antonakis research identifies nine concrete charismatic leadership tactics: using metaphors and stories, showing moral conviction, expressing shared feelings, setting high expectations, using contrast and rhetorical questions, using lists, and animating communication with body language. These are the building blocks. But building blocks need a foundation — and that foundation is emotional and cultural intelligence.

Take metaphors, for example. A metaphor is only powerful if it resonates with the audience. In Gugin's cross-cultural leadership programmes, leaders quickly discover that a metaphor drawn from American sports culture may fall flat in a team from Northern Europe, and that a story invoking individual heroism may alienate a collectivist audience in East Asia. The charismatic tactic is the same; the cultural calibration is everything.

The same applies to moral conviction. Appealing to shared values is one of the most potent charismatic tools a leader has. But whose values? Which moral frameworks? A leader operating across multiple cultural contexts must understand that concepts like fairness, loyalty, duty, and hierarchy carry profoundly different weight in different cultures. High cultural intelligence — the ability to read, respect, and adapt to cultural difference — is what allows a leader to express genuine moral conviction that actually connects rather than alienates.

Emotional Intelligence: The Inner Architecture of Charisma

Charisma without emotional grounding is performance. It can work in the short term, but it rarely sustains trust. The leaders Gugin works with are taught to understand that emotional intelligence is not a soft supplement to charismatic leadership — it is its inner architecture.

Consider the tactic of expressing shared feelings. Antonakis identifies this as key: when a leader says "I feel the same uncertainty you do, and here is how I am holding it," they build identification and trust. But this requires real self-awareness. Leaders must be able to name and regulate their own emotional states before they can credibly reflect the emotions of others. In Gugin's programmes, we invest significant time in developing exactly this capacity — helping leaders identify their emotional triggers, understand how their inner states broadcast outward, and build the emotional vocabulary needed to communicate with authenticity.

Empathy — a core dimension of emotional intelligence — also directly underpins several charismatic behaviours. Setting high expectations while simultaneously communicating belief in others (another of the Antonakis tactics) requires a leader who genuinely sees the potential in the people around them. That kind of seeing is empathic. It cannot be faked over time. When Prince produced the band The Time for Warner Brothers, he did not simply demand excellence — he made each member believe they were capable of more than they thought. That is emotionally intelligent leadership in action.

Cultural Intelligence: Charisma That Travels

One of the most important — and most overlooked — dimensions of charismatic leadership in today's world is its cultural portability. A leader who is magnetic in one cultural context may be perceived as arrogant, shallow, or inappropriate in another. This is not a flaw in those audiences. It is a signal that charisma, like all communication, is culturally embedded.

Gugin's work in over 60 countries has shown us that the nine charismatic tactics are universal in their structure but must be culturally adapted in their expression. Rhetorical questions, for instance, invite participation and create anticipation — but their delivery must match the power-distance norms of the audience. In high-hierarchy cultures, a rhetorical question from a senior leader may silence a room rather than energise it. In low-hierarchy cultures, it may spark exactly the engagement intended. Cultural intelligence tells the leader which dynamic they are working in, and how to adjust.

Similarly, the use of storytelling — one of the most powerful charismatic tools — varies enormously across cultures in terms of what stories are appropriate, how direct or indirect they should be, and what kinds of protagonists resonate. Gugin teaches leaders to build a culturally diverse repertoire of stories and to develop the sensitivity to know which story belongs in which room.

How Gugin Trains Charismatic Leaders

Gugin's leadership development programmes integrate the science of charismatic communication with structured development in emotional and cultural intelligence. The process is iterative and experiential, not theoretical.

Leaders begin by gaining honest self-awareness: understanding how they are currently perceived, what emotional signals they project under pressure, and how their default communication style reads across cultures. This foundation phase often surfaces important blind spots — the technically brilliant executive who speaks too abstractly to inspire, the empathetic manager whose conflict-avoidance reads as a lack of conviction.

From there, leaders move into skill-building: practising charismatic communication tactics in safe, structured environments with real feedback. They learn to craft metaphors that carry cultural resonance, to tell personal stories that build connection without oversharing, to use contrast and rhetorical structure to sharpen their message. They receive coaching on non-verbal communication — the body language, vocal variety, and presence that Antonakis identifies as essential to bringing charisma alive.

Finally, leaders apply these skills in live contexts, with coaching support, and receive 360-degree feedback that tracks their progress. This mirrors the approach Antonakis found to be effective — group training combined with individual coaching — and embeds it within the broader cultural and emotional intelligence framework that makes the development durable and globally relevant.

Charisma as a Leadership Responsibility

There is a deeper point worth making. Charisma is not about making yourself more impressive. At its best, it is about making others feel seen, energised, and capable of more than they believed. It is about communicating in a way that bridges difference, builds shared purpose, and creates the conditions for people to do their best work.

In a world where leaders must navigate unprecedented complexity — technological disruption, geopolitical volatility, multi-generational and multicultural workforces — the ability to communicate with clarity, conviction, and emotional resonance is not optional. It is a strategic capability.

Prince didn't work on his charisma because he wanted to be famous. He worked on it because he knew, instinctively, that the music mattered — and that without the ability to connect, the music would never reach the people it was meant for.

The same is true of leadership. The work matters. Charisma is what carries it across.

 

About Gugin  |  Gugin is a global advisory firm specialising in cultural and emotional intelligence. We help organisations build the leadership capability to thrive in a complex, multicultural world. Learn more at www.gugin.com

error: Content is protected from theft