United Airlines corporate culture – a patient to be examined

by Finn Majlergaard | 5. Mar, 2025 | Blog, Article, blog posts on creating great corporate cultures, company culture, corporate culture, Management tips, workplace culture

Share this content

The United Airlines corporate culture exposed

When a Kentucky physician was dragged off a United Airlines plane it naturally created headlines around the world as it was an incomprehensible act, which didn't make sense to anybody. If it had been a violent passenger or a criminal on the run it would have made some kind of sense. But it wasn't. It was an ordinary passenger, who had paid for his ticket and sat in his assigned seat harming no-one.

He was removed because the plane was overbooked and United Airlines evaluated that he was less important than the passengers who couldn't come onboard. But the thing is, the people waiting to get on board the plane were not passengers, but United Airlines employees. The United Airlines corporate culture showed its true face very clearly

This horrific situation was well documented and shared on social media and created headlines around the world. Within a couple of days, the market value of United Airlines dropped 800 million USD. The worst possible situation for any company in the service sector. Almost! It would have been the worst possible situation if it wasn't for the United Airlines corporate culture that miraculously managed to make the situation even worse.

Here is the letter United Airlines CEO sent to the employees after the incident;

Dear Team, Like you, I was upset to see and hear about what happened last night aboard United Express Flight 3411 headed from Chicago to Louisville. While the facts and circumstances are still evolving, especially with respect to why this customer defied Chicago Aviation Security Officers the way he did, to give you a clearer picture of what transpired, I've included below a recap from the preliminary reports filed by our employees. As you will read, this situation was unfortunately compounded when one of the passengers we politely asked to deplane refused and it became necessary to contact Chicago Aviation Security Officers to help. Our employees followed established procedures for dealing with situations like this. While I deeply regret this situation arose, I also emphatically stand behind all of you, and I want to commend you for continuing to go above and beyond to ensure we fly right. I do, however, believe there are lessons we can learn from this experience, and we are taking a close look at the circumstances surrounding this incident. Treating our customers and each other with respect and dignity is at the core of who we are, and we must always remember this no matter how challenging the situation. Oscar

United Airlines CEO Oscar Munoz defends the action stating that  "Our employees followed established procedures for dealing with situations like this". That is lear talking that leaves no misunderstanding about what the United Airlines corporate culture is.

So what does this tell us about the United Airlines corporate culture?

It tells us a lot of things that I will explain below

Rules or people first

We need to have rules in order to be able to function together. When we drive we have rules about in which side of the road to drive and so on. We have a legal system that punishes us for doing harmful things to other people or the society. If you kill another person you go to jail for a long time because we don't tolerate that kind of behaviour. But what if you kill a close relative who is paralysed and in great pain with no chance for recovery? Should you have the same punishment as if you killed another person with cold blood? Probably not. That is why we have exceptions and that is why we in well-developed societies are judging on a scale and not binary guilty or not guilty.

Companies have rules and procedures too but they also have values. All companies say they have values, but frankly; most of these values written on corporate websites and in powerpoint presentations are rubbish! If you have a value, you don't have a need to write it down. In Gugin we have helped many companies develop corporate cultures that fit what the company wants to achieve. One of the first things we do is to get rid of all the "fake news" these value statements on powerpoint presentations and corporate websites are. The real values are those, which sum up your behaviour and in the case of United Airlines, it is fear. Fear is the most important motivation factor we have. We explain more in this article in case you are interested.

United Airlines obviously have a preference for rules and procedures, since Mr Munoz defended the incident by saying the rules and procedures were followed. Then everything is great if that is the mindset you have.

But the world isn't obeying Oscar Munoz' or anyone else's rules. It is far more complex and far too diversified. On board a plane there hundreds of different people with different cultural backgrounds, different fears, different objectives, different relationships with authorities etc. The only thing they have in common is that they want to go from A to B. To achieve that everybody accepts that there some rules that have to be followed and so did the physician from Kentucky.

Here is what United Airlines write on their own website about customer service:

Our United Customer Commitment We are committed to providing a level of service to our customers that makes us a leader in the airline industry. We understand that to do this we need to have a product we are proud of and employees who like coming to work every day. Our goal is to make every flight a positive experience for our customers. Our United Customer Commitment explains our specific service commitments so that we can continue a high level of performance and improve wherever possible. The commitment explains our policies in a clear, consistent and understandable fashion. We have detailed training programs and system enhancements to support our employees in meeting these commitments, and we measure how well we meet them

When they write: "makes us a leader in the airline industry" it generally means squeezing as much money out of you as possible to satisfy the investors.

[et_bloom_inline optin_id="optin_4"]

 

 

 

 

You might also like this

Learn more about how Gugin helps Airlines and Airports creating winning company cultures.

The United Airlines corporate culture exposed

When a Kentucky physician was dragged off a United Airlines plane it naturally created headlines around the world as it was an incomprehensible act, which didn't make sense to anybody. If it had been a violent passenger or a criminal on the run it would have made some kind of sense. But it wasn't. It was an ordinary passenger, who had paid for his ticket and sat in his assigned seat harming no-one.

He was removed because the plane was overbooked and United Airlines evaluated that he was less important than the passengers who couldn't come onboard. But the thing is, the people waiting to get on board the plane were not passengers, but United Airlines employees. The United Airlines corporate culture showed its true face very clearly

This horrific situation was well documented and shared on social media and created headlines around the world. Within a couple of days, the market value of United Airlines dropped 800 million USD. The worst possible situation for any company in the service sector. Almost! It would have been the worst possible situation if it wasn't for the United Airlines corporate culture that miraculously managed to make the situation even worse.

Here is the letter United Airlines CEO sent to the employees after the incident;

Dear Team, Like you, I was upset to see and hear about what happened last night aboard United Express Flight 3411 headed from Chicago to Louisville. While the facts and circumstances are still evolving, especially with respect to why this customer defied Chicago Aviation Security Officers the way he did, to give you a clearer picture of what transpired, I've included below a recap from the preliminary reports filed by our employees. As you will read, this situation was unfortunately compounded when one of the passengers we politely asked to deplane refused and it became necessary to contact Chicago Aviation Security Officers to help. Our employees followed established procedures for dealing with situations like this. While I deeply regret this situation arose, I also emphatically stand behind all of you, and I want to commend you for continuing to go above and beyond to ensure we fly right. I do, however, believe there are lessons we can learn from this experience, and we are taking a close look at the circumstances surrounding this incident. Treating our customers and each other with respect and dignity is at the core of who we are, and we must always remember this no matter how challenging the situation. Oscar

United Airlines CEO Oscar Munoz defends the action stating that  "Our employees followed established procedures for dealing with situations like this". That is lear talking that leaves no misunderstanding about what the United Airlines corporate culture is.

 

Management by fear

The crew followed the rules, but I am absolutely sure they were uncomfortable with it because they could see that in this situation it was totally wrong. So why didn't they say. "we have some rules but we need to solve this in another way"? Because of fear, I am sure. Fear of being punished if they break the rules, fear of being punished if they have to leave United Airlines employees on the ground. The crew's fear is so intense that they are willing to risk everything to follow the rules.

If customer service was a key priority and if it was a value in the company, the situation could have been resolved in the same way as similar situations are resolved many times every single day at all airlines around the world. One of the most common ways to solve this is to make an announcement to the passengers on board the plane, that the plane is overbooked. The ask if someone are willing to wait for the next flight or be re-routed in return for a compensation. If not enough people volunteer to increase the compensation until the situation is resolved. It happens this way many times a day. Except at United Airlines of course because customer satisfaction is not a value - only profitability is.

I feel so sorry for the employees

As a passenger, you can choose to fly with someone else if you don't like an airline. As a flight attendant, it is a bit more complicated. It is a job that pays your bills. You just don't switch to another airline if you don't like the culture in the airline you are working with. Hub location, unemployment rate, friendship with current colleagues etc. are determining factors in the decision process for quitting a job.

Don't blame the United Airlines employees

These people who caused this incident would have behaved totally different if the United Airlines corporate culture had been different. I am sure they are excellent in doing their job, but when they end up in a dilemma they choose to follow the rules instead of preserving customer satisfaction. They do that because of fear - a fear that is very painful to carry and live with. I know that because we have worked with so many companies in a number of different industries where similar problems exist.

So instead of trying to be funny or sarcastic with the united airlines' employees - Give them a hug. They need it

#HugAUnitedAirlineEmployeeToday

 

 

 

 

You might also like this

Why you should always bring a hard case on board in the cabin

 

What shall United Airlines do now?

They can continue to focus on satisfying the shareholders only and hope that this incident will be forgotten or they can start a transformation process towards building relationships with the customers so that they remain loyal to you and will forgive you when you make mistakes. But to be honest I think United Airlines will stick with the first option.

What to know what YOUR real corporate culture is like? Read here

Book a Speech or Workshop on how to develop a corporate culture that prevents you from ending up like United Airlines

Whether you are an airline or any other service focused company you are no better than the service your customers feel they get. When you have a strong admirable corporate culture your customers will easier forgive you if you make a mistake. The United Airlines corporate culture is definitely working against the airline's reputation

Book Dr Finn Majlergaard for a speech or workshop on how you can achieve that. Read more here.

 

AND - Please share if you like

 

 

 

 

What separates a good leader from one who truly moves people? Research — and decades of cultural intelligence practice — point to one word: charisma. And unlike talent, charisma can be learned.

In 1979, Warner Records refused to send Prince on tour. Not because of his music — they knew he was exceptional — but because he lacked charisma. He couldn't yet move an audience. Fast forward one year, and Prince had transformed himself into one of the most commanding performers in the history of popular music. He didn't wait for charisma to arrive. He worked at it, systematically, studying and adopting the techniques of the performers he admired.

That story is not just about rock and roll. It is a precise metaphor for leadership. At Gugin, we have spent over two decades helping leaders across cultures and industries make exactly this kind of transformation — not by telling them to "be more confident," but by equipping them with concrete, learnable strategies rooted in emotional intelligence, cultural intelligence, and communication science.

 

Why Most Charisma Advice Fails

The most common advice leaders receive about charisma is frustratingly vague: project confidence, be warm, be present. These qualities do matter. But they are nearly impossible to "just do" on command, especially under pressure, across cultures, or in unfamiliar organisational contexts.

Research by Professor John Antonakis and his colleagues at the University of Lausanne Business School has shown that charisma is not a personality trait reserved for the few — it is a set of communicative behaviours that can be identified, taught, and practised. In their studies, randomly selected middle managers who underwent structured charisma training were subsequently rated by peers and subordinates as more charismatic, more competent, and more trustworthy. The training worked.

At Gugin, we have built on this science and gone further — weaving it together with emotional intelligence (EQ) and cultural intelligence (CQ) to create a leadership development approach that is both evidence-based and globally applicable.

The Nine Charismatic Behaviours — And What They Really Require

The Antonakis research identifies nine concrete charismatic leadership tactics: using metaphors and stories, showing moral conviction, expressing shared feelings, setting high expectations, using contrast and rhetorical questions, using lists, and animating communication with body language. These are the building blocks. But building blocks need a foundation — and that foundation is emotional and cultural intelligence.

Take metaphors, for example. A metaphor is only powerful if it resonates with the audience. In Gugin's cross-cultural leadership programmes, leaders quickly discover that a metaphor drawn from American sports culture may fall flat in a team from Northern Europe, and that a story invoking individual heroism may alienate a collectivist audience in East Asia. The charismatic tactic is the same; the cultural calibration is everything.

The same applies to moral conviction. Appealing to shared values is one of the most potent charismatic tools a leader has. But whose values? Which moral frameworks? A leader operating across multiple cultural contexts must understand that concepts like fairness, loyalty, duty, and hierarchy carry profoundly different weight in different cultures. High cultural intelligence — the ability to read, respect, and adapt to cultural difference — is what allows a leader to express genuine moral conviction that actually connects rather than alienates.

Emotional Intelligence: The Inner Architecture of Charisma

Charisma without emotional grounding is performance. It can work in the short term, but it rarely sustains trust. The leaders Gugin works with are taught to understand that emotional intelligence is not a soft supplement to charismatic leadership — it is its inner architecture.

Consider the tactic of expressing shared feelings. Antonakis identifies this as key: when a leader says "I feel the same uncertainty you do, and here is how I am holding it," they build identification and trust. But this requires real self-awareness. Leaders must be able to name and regulate their own emotional states before they can credibly reflect the emotions of others. In Gugin's programmes, we invest significant time in developing exactly this capacity — helping leaders identify their emotional triggers, understand how their inner states broadcast outward, and build the emotional vocabulary needed to communicate with authenticity.

Empathy — a core dimension of emotional intelligence — also directly underpins several charismatic behaviours. Setting high expectations while simultaneously communicating belief in others (another of the Antonakis tactics) requires a leader who genuinely sees the potential in the people around them. That kind of seeing is empathic. It cannot be faked over time. When Prince produced the band The Time for Warner Brothers, he did not simply demand excellence — he made each member believe they were capable of more than they thought. That is emotionally intelligent leadership in action.

Cultural Intelligence: Charisma That Travels

One of the most important — and most overlooked — dimensions of charismatic leadership in today's world is its cultural portability. A leader who is magnetic in one cultural context may be perceived as arrogant, shallow, or inappropriate in another. This is not a flaw in those audiences. It is a signal that charisma, like all communication, is culturally embedded.

Gugin's work in over 60 countries has shown us that the nine charismatic tactics are universal in their structure but must be culturally adapted in their expression. Rhetorical questions, for instance, invite participation and create anticipation — but their delivery must match the power-distance norms of the audience. In high-hierarchy cultures, a rhetorical question from a senior leader may silence a room rather than energise it. In low-hierarchy cultures, it may spark exactly the engagement intended. Cultural intelligence tells the leader which dynamic they are working in, and how to adjust.

Similarly, the use of storytelling — one of the most powerful charismatic tools — varies enormously across cultures in terms of what stories are appropriate, how direct or indirect they should be, and what kinds of protagonists resonate. Gugin teaches leaders to build a culturally diverse repertoire of stories and to develop the sensitivity to know which story belongs in which room.

How Gugin Trains Charismatic Leaders

Gugin's leadership development programmes integrate the science of charismatic communication with structured development in emotional and cultural intelligence. The process is iterative and experiential, not theoretical.

Leaders begin by gaining honest self-awareness: understanding how they are currently perceived, what emotional signals they project under pressure, and how their default communication style reads across cultures. This foundation phase often surfaces important blind spots — the technically brilliant executive who speaks too abstractly to inspire, the empathetic manager whose conflict-avoidance reads as a lack of conviction.

From there, leaders move into skill-building: practising charismatic communication tactics in safe, structured environments with real feedback. They learn to craft metaphors that carry cultural resonance, to tell personal stories that build connection without oversharing, to use contrast and rhetorical structure to sharpen their message. They receive coaching on non-verbal communication — the body language, vocal variety, and presence that Antonakis identifies as essential to bringing charisma alive.

Finally, leaders apply these skills in live contexts, with coaching support, and receive 360-degree feedback that tracks their progress. This mirrors the approach Antonakis found to be effective — group training combined with individual coaching — and embeds it within the broader cultural and emotional intelligence framework that makes the development durable and globally relevant.

Charisma as a Leadership Responsibility

There is a deeper point worth making. Charisma is not about making yourself more impressive. At its best, it is about making others feel seen, energised, and capable of more than they believed. It is about communicating in a way that bridges difference, builds shared purpose, and creates the conditions for people to do their best work.

In a world where leaders must navigate unprecedented complexity — technological disruption, geopolitical volatility, multi-generational and multicultural workforces — the ability to communicate with clarity, conviction, and emotional resonance is not optional. It is a strategic capability.

Prince didn't work on his charisma because he wanted to be famous. He worked on it because he knew, instinctively, that the music mattered — and that without the ability to connect, the music would never reach the people it was meant for.

The same is true of leadership. The work matters. Charisma is what carries it across.

 

About Gugin  |  Gugin is a global advisory firm specialising in cultural and emotional intelligence. We help organisations build the leadership capability to thrive in a complex, multicultural world. Learn more at www.gugin.com

error: Content is protected from theft